The post How to Personalize Email Campaign Communication with AI appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>Define a promotion, select multiple products, write the copy, and send it to your whole customer database – that’s building email campaigns the old way. Different customers receive the same message, even when their behavior, preferences, and intent are completely different, often within the same segment.
What if, instead of sending the same version of a campaign to everyone, each customer received a version tailored to what they’ve browsed, bought, and are likely to do next?

Let us show you what’s possible when you change the approach with the help of AI.
In our example, let’s look at a global activewear brand with a strong eCommerce presence and a CRM system already in place. They run regular promotional email campaigns and have a solid setup:
However, most campaigns are still built using rules like segments based on past purchases or activity, predefined product selections, and fixed messaging per audience group, which creates a big personalization gap.
Customers shopping for activewear (or any other product) can behave very differently and be looking for different things, yet they receive the same email. The data about their purchase history, preferences, engagement, and browsing and shopping behavior is there, but it isn’t being used to decide what each customer should see.
The impact of personalizing emails is highest at specific moments in the customer lifecycle.
Here’s a common scenario:
A customer has signed up, browsed products, maybe even made an initial purchase, but hasn’t come back in a while. Purchase intent is uncertain, and churn risk is increasing.
Also read:
Case Study: Conversational Commerce Brings 31% of Churned Customers Back
Most CRM setups already account for this with a predefined flow: Identify inactive users (e.g., no purchase in the last 30 days) → Place them into a re-engagement segment → Send a reminder or offer.
What you need to take into account is that within this “at-risk” group, customers are very different. They are grouped by inactivity, but instead of treating them as a single audience, it becomes a starting point for understanding what each individual customer is missing and what would motivate them to return.
To personalize email at an individual level, you first need to move beyond segments and look at actual behavior. For each customer, the goal is to build a simple, usable profile based on what they’ve already done.
The best part is, this doesn’t require new data. It uses what most brands already have – purchase history, browsing activity, product categories viewed or bought, engagement with past emails or campaigns, etc.
From this, you can start to understand patterns, for example:
These patterns help answer a practical and significant question – what is this customer actually interested in right now? At this stage, you want to create a clear enough picture to guide the next decision, even if you don’t predict everything perfectly.
Instead of assigning someone to a broad segment, you’re defining what they prefer, how they shop, and where they are in their journey. This profile becomes the input for personalization and as the foundation for deciding what each customer should see next.
Once you have a clear view of customer behavior, the next step is to decide what makes the most sense for that specific customer to see. Here’s where AI becomes the most useful.
Instead of relying on predefined rules (e.g., “if customer bought X, show Y”), AI can evaluate multiple signals at once and determine which product is most relevant, what type of message fits best, and how to position the offer.
For example:
You’re no longer selecting products and writing one message for a segment. You’re letting the system decide, per customer, what to highlight, why it matters, how to present it, and maximize engagement. Each customer gets a direction that reflects their own behavior, and raw data becomes something actionable.
Once the decision is made (product + angle + message), the email itself becomes straightforward. The system generates a version of the email for each customer using the selected product, the chosen message angle, a subject line that matches the intent, and a customized CTA. The structure of the email remains consistent, but the product, tone, and reasons to buy are tailored to each individual.
At this point, the campaign functions as a system that automatically produces many variations:




To make this happen, you don’t need to replace your current tools. The CRM still triggers the campaign, defines the audience (e.g., at-risk users), builds emails, and handles delivery.
What changes is what happens before the email is sent. Instead of pulling fixed templates and predefined product blocks, the system generates personalized content with tailored recommendations.
So the setup becomes:
The data is already there, and the campaigns already exist. What changes are the decisions before the email is sent. When each customer sees products and messaging that match how they actually shop, you will notice the difference immediately in higher engagement, clicks, conversions, and revenue.
Curious how this would work for your business? Contact our AI & email marketing strategists today, and we’ll show you concrete examples based on your products and customer purchase patterns, and show what your campaigns could look like with AI-driven personalization.
The post How to Personalize Email Campaign Communication with AI appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post The Build vs Buy Equation Has Flipped: Why Custom Software Is Becoming Cheaper than SaaS appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>For the last two decades, enterprise software has followed a simple rule:
Don’t build what you can buy.
It was a good rule. In many cases, it still is. SaaS replaced large upfront projects with subscriptions, reduced the burden of maintenance, accelerated deployment, and gave companies access to software that would have been too expensive or too risky to build on their own. For standard functions, buying beat building by a wide margin.
But somewhere along the way, a smart principle turned into a default assumption, and companies simply assumed that software should be bought.
And that worked well enough for generic workflows. It worked far less well for the messy, high-value, constantly changing systems that sit inside real businesses: pricing logic, promotions, supplier operations, catalog workflows, forecasting, approvals, exceptions, and all the operational decisions that never fit neatly inside standard software.
So businesses adapted. Not necessarily by solving the problem, but by building around it. You know, with spreadsheets, exports, manual checks, middleware, custom reports, and “temporary” workarounds that became permanent.
In this 2026 moment, the SaaS era is not ending. But the era in which SaaS was automatically the cheapest, safest, most rational answer is.
AI has changed the economics of software development. What used to require large teams, long timelines, and budgets that only the biggest enterprises could justify can now be delivered far faster, with much smaller teams, and shaped around the business from the start.
For differentiated, business-critical workflows, custom software is becoming the better, cheaper choice.
For years, if a capability already existed in the market, it made little sense to build it from scratch. That logic reflected the reality of how software economics worked at the time.
Compared with traditional custom development, SaaS offered clear advantages:
Because the model worked so well, “buy, don’t build” became one of the most widely accepted rules in business technology.
A standard SaaS platform is often the right choice when the goal is to run a common process efficiently. Therefore, tools for areas like payroll, HR, ticketing, or collaboration became so widely adopted.
But the logic gets weaker when software is tied to workflows like:
In those cases, beyond just a tool, a company is also buying someone else’s assumptions about how that workflow should function.
For a long time, the alternative looked worse because custom software had a reputation for involving long discovery and requirements phases, large engineering teams, long delivery cycles, expensive change requests, and great risk before value is created.
Even when leaders knew that no SaaS product really fit their way of operating, buying still felt safer than building. It seemed more rational to adapt the business than to take on the cost and uncertainty of a custom development effort. That is why the old rule lasted for so long.
If SaaS became the default choice, it was also because custom development became too expensive to justify in most cases. For years, building software meant taking on a level of cost, risk, and uncertainty that most businesses wanted to avoid.
Custom software was both expensive and slow to produce confidence. While a SaaS product could be bought, configured, and shown to the business quickly, a custom development project often required months of planning and years of implementation before teams could properly judge whether it would solve the problem.
In custom development, buyers were often asked to commit to the budget first and wait for proof later. That made custom software harder to sell internally, harder to approve financially, and generally harder to sustain.
Custom became associated with
complexity,
delays,
budget risks,
hard-to-maintain systems, and
one-off projects that depended too heavily on specific people or vendors.
SaaS, by contrast, came to represent
speed,
predictability,
lower commitment, and
lower perceived risk.
Now that delivery model is changing, and that change is what makes the current shift possible.
The old logic behind SaaS depended on the fact that building had to remain the more expensive path. Even when the software was rigid, even when important workflows spilled into spreadsheets, even when teams had to bridge gaps manually, buying still looked rational because building seemed heavier.
With AI, systems that once demanded long timelines, large teams, and extensive budgets can now be delivered much faster and with far less overhead. In some cases, work that previously took years can now be built in a matter of weeks.
What made custom development expensive was long translation cycles between business and delivery teams, large requirements documents, repeated alignment, handoffs, clarification, rework, and the pressure to define too much too early. By the time a system began to take shape, a significant portion of the budget had already been spent on preparing to build.
That is one of the first places where the economics have shifted.
Teams can now move from business need to working software much faster. Instead of trying to describe the whole system in documents, they can put logic into a usable form earlier, test it sooner, and refine it while the solution is still flexible.
In the old model, custom software required defining most of the system before it was built. That made change expensive and forced businesses to make decisions too early, often before they had seen how the system would actually work.
Now, when teams can move into working software earlier, they can:
This is what makes the shift meaningful. For a long time, there was always a gap between how a business actually operated and what its software could support. A gap filled with spreadsheets, manual steps, and workarounds, but as building becomes faster and less expensive, that gap becomes easier to close. Software can be shaped around real workflows, real decision logic, and real exceptions.
When a business is already operating through spreadsheets, exports, and manual reconciliation, it is effectively paying for custom logic anyway, just in a slower and riskier form.
SaaS looks efficient on paper – predictable subscription fees, faster setup, no need to build from scratch, but the real cost of software is everything required to make that software actually work for the business.
When software does not match how a business operates, the gap typically moves into:
This creates a second layer of infrastructure, one that is invisible in budgets, distributed across teams, and expensive to maintain. So, the company is still building custom logic, just doing it outside the system it pays for.
As more tools are added, systems solve parts of the problem, but split logic across multiple places, creating ongoing cost. Once the cost of building comes down, the idea that SaaS is always the cheapest option is no longer true.
Custom will first replace workflows that are core to margin or growth, unique to the business, exception-heavy, cross-functional, constantly changing, painful to force into off-the-shelf logic. Here’s what our clients experienced after they stopped paying rent on software and switched:
| System | Tool replaced | Before | After |
| Task & project management | Jira | $74,000/year for basic use (task boards, sprints), using a fraction of the product | Custom-built system in 5 weeks, $32,000 one-time cost |
| Performance & review management | Small Improvements | $16,000/year, limited customization, rigid review frameworks | Custom platform for $15,500 with company-specific rules and workflows |
| Recruitment & onboarding | Pinpoint | $42,000/year, no support for ERP integration or custom onboarding | Unified system for $35,000 integrated with ERP, reducing time-to-hire by 1/3 |
| Loyalty & engagement | Braze | $120,000/year, increasing costs, limited flexibility for campaigns | Custom loyalty engine for $90,000 integrated with CRM and commerce stack; +27% repeat purchases |
When systems like these can be delivered in weeks instead of months, and at a fraction of the long-term cost, the build vs buy equation starts to behave differently. Workflows that were once accepted as “good enough” under SaaS become clear candidates for replacement.
The shift toward custom software does not mean everything should be built. SaaS still makes sense in a large part of the enterprise stack, and in many cases, it remains the more efficient option. What is changing is not the value of SaaS itself, but the assumption that it should be the default for every system.
SaaS works best in areas where processes are consistent across companies and do not require constant adaptation, i.e., where standardization is not a limitation, but an advantage. Some examples include:
The way one company runs payroll or accounting is not meaningfully different from another, so there is little benefit in tailoring these systems, and the cost of doing so would rarely be justified. In these cases, SaaS delivers exactly what it promises: reliable functionality, faster deployment, and less internal overhead.
What is emerging instead is a clearer separation between two types of software inside a business:
Supporting systems are stable, repeatable, and similar across organizations. Defining systems are tied to how a company makes decisions, manages complexity, and drives performance. SaaS continues to fit naturally in the first category. Custom development is becoming a cheaper and overall a better choice in the second.
The principle is simple – buy what is common, build what makes your business different. The challenge is knowing where to apply it.
A practical starting point is to look at how work actually gets done inside the business today. The strongest signals are usually not in the systems themselves, but in the work happening around them.
What to do
Make sure to evaluate the cost more realistically by looking at the full picture over time: ongoing SaaS spend, operational overhead, time lost to manual processes, and limitations on how the system can evolve.
The SaaS era is not ending everywhere, but the era in which SaaS was the automatic cheapest answer is ending now. The next generation of enterprise software will be built around how the business actually works.
Is your SaaS stack still worth it? Tell us what you need to replace or build! We scope your system during a free 60-minute session and show you what a custom build for your stack looks like.
The post The Build vs Buy Equation Has Flipped: Why Custom Software Is Becoming Cheaper than SaaS appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Scouting America’s Hyvä Transformation Improves Performance, Conversions, and AOV appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>Thanks to all of you for the effort that got us to where we are. It serves as a great example of thoughtful planning, communication, and diligence in pursuit of a very important milestone in our journey to deliver a best-in-class eCommerce experience.
John Noone
Director of Information Technology at Scouting America
Scouting America is a cornerstone of youth development, supported by over 628,000 volunteers nationwide, providing programs that have impacted 130+ million young people since its founding in 1910. Through its online store, scoutshop.org, the organization offers a wide range of uniforms, badges, and official gear for scouts and their families.
As their eCommerce platform aged, so did their ability to offer a seamless online shopping experience. The existing platform faced critical performance issues and a growing demand for modern functionality.
With scandiweb, Scouting America had a successful migration from its old Luma-based platform to a high-performing, mobile-optimized storefront built with Hyvä and hosted on Readymage, resulting in an eCommerce experience that improved speed, user engagement, and conversion rates across the site and devices.
The core objectives of this project were centered around enhancing the user experience through improved site performance, while ensuring a transition from the legacy platform.
The main pain points identified were:
The project aligned infrastructure transformation and frontend modernization into one coordinated launch.
The entire storefront was rebuilt using Hyvä’s base combined with scandiweb’s library for consistency and scalability. We fully revamped the homepage with dynamic product sliders, SEO-rich content blocks, and a modern design system that catered to desktop and mobile users. Product pages were optimized with a clean layout and easy navigation.
Hyvä’s optimized frontend allowed for faster loading times and a more stable and responsive experience for users.
Given the high volume of mobile traffic, the entire site was designed with mobile performance in mind, including:

Simultaneously, the backend migration to ReadyMage addressed security and future-proofing. ReadyMage provided a robust hosting environment designed to handle high-traffic volumes while maintaining fast performance and compliance.
One of the major infrastructure requirements was PCI DSS compliance for secure transactions. ReadyMage ensured that the platform met these stringent security standards, providing secure payment gateways and data protection. Beyond PCI compliance, Readymage improved site security, reducing the vulnerability of the system to attacks and breaches and providing a more controlled environment for data handling and security management.
ReadyMage offers scalable cloud hosting that allows Scouting America’s eCommerce store to grow without the need for major infrastructure changes.
The redesign also included technical SEO improvements:
ReadyMage’s infrastructure provided the security and scalability Scouting America needed to support their growth, and frontend optimization with Hyvä showed transformative results early:

Core Web Vitals improvements
Looking to modernize eCommerce infrastructure and improve site performance? Contact us today to discuss how we can help you deliver a faster, more engaging experience for your customers.
The post Scouting America’s Hyvä Transformation Improves Performance, Conversions, and AOV appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Guide to Choosing the Right Magento Strategy and Consulting Partner appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>At some point, every growing Magento store becomes more complex to manage. When migrating to Magento 2, integrating complex systems, or optimizing your online store, a skilled partner can make all the difference.
A strong Magento partner guides you through the strategic decisions to benefit the future of your online business. But with so many options out there, how do you find the right fit? In this article, I will walk you through the key factors to consider when selecting between Magento consulting companies. The goal is to ensure you find a partner who meets your current needs and can also support your long-term growth and success.
At first, building and launching a site can seem like the biggest hurdle, but as you scale, new challenges emerge, such as handling increased traffic, integrating with third-party systems, optimizing site performance, and ensuring your technology aligns with business goals. At this stage, a Magento strategy and consulting partner becomes invaluable.
They help you develop a holistic strategy, guiding every decision from platform selection to growth planning, tailoring their approach to meet your specific needs and ensure your Magento store operates at peak performance.
While it’s clear that every business can benefit from a Magento strategy partner, there are certain moments when consulting becomes essential to avoid roadblocks:
If you’re unsure where to start or whether Magento is the right platform for your business, consulting with a partner early on can save time, money, and headaches. They’ll help you evaluate whether Magento Open Source, Adobe Commerce, or another platform is the best choice, and provide recommendations on the right architecture for your goals.
Once your site begins attracting more customers, you may experience performance issues or bottlenecks in your backend processes. A Magento consultant will perform technical audits to identify weak points and develop a plan to optimize the platform.
If you’re integrating Magento with other systems like ERP, PIM, or CRM, a consultant is essential. Their expertise ensures seamless platform integration, reducing manual errors.
Moving from another eCommerce platform to Magento, or upgrading from Magento 1 to Magento 2, is no small task. Consulting with an expert ensures the migration process is smooth, with minimal downtime and a strategic plan to ensure a successful transition.
Launching your Magento store is only the beginning. Ongoing optimization is needed to keep up with customer expectations and market trends regarding tech and growth strategies. A Magento consultant helps you with continuous performance improvements, like fine-tuning SEO, enhancing UX, or adding advanced features.
Additionally, you likely need strategic guidance if:
I’ve learned that when Magento is at the heart of your revenue, you can’t skip long-term planning. The best consulting partners are always thinking two or three steps ahead, looking at what happens after the development team is done.
In practice, a good partner does much more than manage development tasks or troubleshoot technical issues. They act as a strategic advisor, helping businesses make smarter decisions about how to use Magento to support growth and create better backend and frontend experiences.
They typically start by understanding the bigger picture – learning about your business model, revenue goals, internal workflows, customer expectations, and existing technology stack. From there, they translate those needs into a practical Magento strategy that aligns technology with business priorities.
One of the most valuable consulting services a Magento partner provides is strategic direction. Rather than jumping straight into development, they help define a roadmap based on your goals, budget, and growth stage, which may include prioritizing features or identifying the best path for expansion.
They also help answer broader strategic questions about platform choice, tech stack, whether a headless setup makes sense, and whether your current platform architecture can support future growth.
From my experience, Magento projects often become complex quickly, especially when multiple systems need to work together. A consulting partner evaluates your current setup and recommends the right technical architecture by reviewing your hosting environment, extensions, custom code, third-party integrations, and overall site health. Their role is to identify technical problems and also prevent them.
For many, Magento is only one part of a larger commerce ecosystem, in need to connect with ERP, CRM, PIM, shipping, inventory, payment, or marketing automation systems. A Magento strategy partner helps plan these integrations carefully so that data flows smoothly and business processes become more efficient.
This is especially important for companies with complex product catalogs, multi-store operations, B2B requirements, or omnichannel sales strategies. In these cases, a Magento enterprise partner helps as much with improving internal operations as with improving the storefront itself.
A Magento consulting partner also helps improve how the store performs for customers by:
A good partner ties these tasks back to measurable business outcomes, such as revenue, average order value, or customer retention, rather than treating them in isolation. They may also recommend changes based on user behavior and other analytics data, helping ensure the store supports marketing and sales goals.
Also read:
How a Dedicated eCommerce Manager Can Help Your Online Business
Many Magento businesses continue to work with strategy partners after go-live to support ongoing optimization and long-term growth. The consulting partner helps reassess priorities, respond to new challenges, and make sure the platform continues to deliver value. In that sense, this partner becomes an extension of your team, bringing technical expertise, strategic thinking, a growth mindset, and a long-term perspective to every stage of your eCommerce journey.
Choosing who to work with on your Magento store is about finding a team that can reduce risk, support the business as it grows, and ultimately help you make better decisions. The strongest agencies bring a mix of technical depth and practical delivery experience. Here’s what to consider.
Magento experience alone is not enough. Check if the agency has handled projects that look like yours in terms of complexity, scale, and business model. A partner that has worked on simple brochure-style commerce builds may not be the right fit for a multi-store, integration-heavy environment.
Look for evidence that they have managed projects involving migrations, custom workflows, large catalogs, international expansion, or high-traffic trading periods. If your business operates across multiple regions or relies on several backend systems, you need a team that has already worked with that level of complexity and knows where problems typically arise.
With more than 2,100 completed digital experience projects and 700+ clients worldwide, scandiweb has seen enough complexity to recognize patterns before they become production issues. We helped PUMA launch four markets in 95 days, supported BUFF’s Adobe Commerce rollout across 44 stores in 59 countries, and worked with brands like JYSK in demanding international eCommerce environments. Experienced teams tend to spot upgrade risks, performance bottlenecks, and other challenges early, which is often what separates a stable Magento program from an expensive one to maintain.
Certifications should be treated as one signal rather than the whole story. It is worth checking whether the agency holds Adobe certifications, but it is even more important to ask how many certified engineers will actually be assigned to your project. In other words, do not stop at the badges on the website. Find out who is doing the work and whether the team has the depth to handle architecture, integrations, performance, and ongoing support.
Worth noting here, scandiweb has the largest Adobe-certified developer team in the world, with 890+ Adobe certifications across the team.
A good Magento partner should understand that your website is part of a larger business system. In addition to features and development hours, they should be able to talk about customer experience, operational efficiency, platform scalability, and long-term priorities.
The right agency will ask smart questions about your roadmap, internal processes, customer segments, and growth plans, challenge assumptions, explain trade-offs, and help you prioritize what matters most. If they immediately agree with every idea, that is not always a good sign.
At scandiweb, we see a Magento build as part of a wider commerce operation that needs the right architecture, user experience, and performance foundations to support growth over time.
Look for case studies that go beyond surface-level claims. Anyone can say they delivered a successful Magento project – what matters is whether they can show what success actually looked like. Did they help increase conversion rates? Improve performance under load? Support revenue growth after launch? Reduce operational friction through better integrations? Handle upgrades without creating instability over time? The more clearly an agency can connect its work to business outcomes, the more confidence you can have in its approach.
Read about Magento projects by scandiweb across different industries:
Magento projects are rarely simple, which makes communication and process especially important. You want a partner who can explain how they work. You should also know how they handle risk when things go wrong.
Transparency matters at every stage – timelines, assumptions, responsibilities, dependencies, and cost drivers should all be discussed openly. If an agency avoids specifics early on, that lack of clarity usually becomes more painful once the project is underway.
Stores evolve, business priorities shift, integrations change, and customer expectations keep changing, too. I always suggest choosing a partner that can support more than the initial build.
Some businesses need a strategic advisor for roadmap planning and architecture decisions; others need ongoing optimization, release support, or help managing technical debt. Either way, it is worth asking whether the agency can support the business after launch or whether their model is built mainly around one-time project delivery.
This is where the evaluation gets real. On paper, many agencies look similar; they all talk about transformation, growth, and seamless customer experiences, but the difference usually shows up when you start asking detailed questions about how they have handled real-world complexity.
I would start by asking how many genuinely complex Magento projects they have handled:
Have you managed multi-country launches?
What about high-traffic migrations?
Do you know how to handle integration-heavy builds that involve ERP, CRM, PIM, or custom middleware?
What metrics do you focus on and why?
Can you explain how the platform was maintained and upgraded over time?
From there, it helps to ask more operational questions that only experienced teams can answer clearly:
What happened when the ERP sync failed during a campaign?
How did you handle data lag when order volume spiked?
Did API limits ever force you to rethink the architecture?
What did peak production traffic actually look like, and how did the platform behave under that pressure?
It is also worth watching where they try to steer the conversation. If you are asking about systems, scale, release risk, and business continuity, but they keep pulling the discussion back to design, branding, or creative direction, that usually tells you where their real strengths are. That does not make them a bad agency, but it may make them the wrong consulting partner for a technically demanding Magento project.
| Agency | Adobe tier | What stands out | Best fit |
| scandiweb | Gold | 600+ Magento specialists, 890+ Adobe certifications, 2,100+ eCommerce projects, and 24/7 support. Enterprise-scale, multi-market work with PUMA, BUFF®, OM System | Best overall choice for large global B2C and B2B enterprise brands that need deep Adobe Commerce expertise plus strategy, UX, CRO, performance engineering, and support |
| SmartOSC | Gold | Asia’s leading Magento community builder, with global enterprise delivery across Adobe Commerce, Marketing Cloud, and AEM, with experience serving brands worldwide | Enterprise brands that want a wider Adobe stack and strong APAC delivery |
| Synolia | Gold | Has been in Adobe Commerce for nearly 15 years, has delivered 100+ large-scale projects | European brands that want a seasoned Adobe Commerce-led partner for large-scale commerce programs |
| Krish Technolabs | Gold | 20+ years of Adobe Commerce experience, covering consulting, migration, integration, and growth support, with regional experts across the Americas, EMEA, and APAC | Brands seeking a flexible partner for migrations, integrations, and multi-region rollouts |
| Classy Llama | Silver | Has worked with Magento/Adobe Commerce since 2007, holds 47 Adobe certifications, has completed 200+ builds | North American B2B or integration-heavy Adobe Commerce work |
Choosing a partner to support your Magento store is certainly a growth decision. The right agency should help you reduce risk, make smarter platform decisions, and build a Magento ecosystem that can support the business as it grows.
Experience matters, but so do strategic thinking, technical depth, transparent delivery, and the ability to challenge assumptions when needed. In complex Magento environments, the best partner is the one that understands the trade-offs, asks better questions, and helps you move forward with confidence. Magento is powerful, but it takes the right partner to turn that power into long-term business value.
A Magento strategy partner steps in before development begins.
They map out your architecture, plan how integrations will roll out, set up upgrade routines, and think through how you’ll scale over time. They make sure every feature actually makes sense for your business.
They challenge assumptions, help you fine-tune your scope, and stop you from making choices that seem smart now but turn into technical debt later.
The costs vary according to scope and complexity.
For mid-sized businesses, consulting might start with an architecture audit or a roadmap workshop. Bigger enterprise projects, like integration modeling, performance tuning, or planning for multiple countries, will naturally cost more.
The more connected your commerce stack becomes, the more you need someone to keep an eye on the big picture.
Several established agencies operate in this space, including:
Each of them has different strengths, ranging from enterprise transformation programs to engineering-focused modernization initiatives. The right partner depends on how complex your setup is, how many markets you’re in, how closely your systems interact, and just how ambitious your plans are.
Magento remains one of the most flexible commerce platforms. It supports deep customization, complex integrations, headless architectures, and multi-market expansion.
Magento works best when you pair it with smart architecture, careful upgrade planning, and performance oversight.
Are you evaluating Magento consulting support? At scandiweb, we combine global Adobe Commerce expertise with hands-on experience across strategy, architecture, UX, CRO, analytics, and performance engineering. Talk to our team to discuss your goals and map out the right next step.
The post Guide to Choosing the Right Magento Strategy and Consulting Partner appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Best Practices for Product Detail Pages in 2026 appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>We just published a post on best practices for product listing pages. Now let’s take a step further in the shopping funnel and have a look at product detail pages (PDP).
The product detail page is where you provide details about a product. It usually includes several photos, a description, the price, and most importantly, a CTA (call to action) to add the product to the shopping bag. It sounds fairly simple to put together, yes. However, if best practices are not taken into account, the user experience on product details pages can quickly go wrong.
Today, PDPs also need to work for three audiences at once: the shopper, search engines, and AI shopping tools that increasingly surface product results directly. Getting the page right matters more than it used to.
So here are the best practices to follow on product detail pages.
Good product photos could be the key element that convinces a user to add a product to their shopping bag. If done right, product photos can inspire the user’s imagination and evoke positive emotions about the product. If done wrong, they either do nothing at all to add to the user experience or negatively impacts it in the worst case scenario. Here are the main things to remember when adding photos to the product detail page:





It should be reiterated that the CTA is the most important element on the product detail page. It is what takes the user to the next step of the shopping journey, moving them closer to conversion. Here’s what you need to keep in mind when working with CTAs:



Also a small but effective pattern worth adopting: place a benefit-driven line directly above the CTA — something like “Free returns · Ships in 24h · 4.8 stars from 2,400 reviews.” It answers the last-second doubt without requiring the user to scroll anywhere.
Variant selectors — size, color, material — are one of the most friction-prone parts of any PDP. A few things that consistently help:
Another major part of a good product detail page is the actual content of the page. Some users might depend solely on product photos and reviews; however, there are users who like to read and get into those details accurately. Here’s what’s important:



One practical consideration for larger catalogs: AI-assisted product descriptions have become a viable tool for maintaining quality at scale. The key is treating AI output as a first draft — the copy should still reflect the brand’s voice and include the specific details (materials, dimensions, use cases) that generic descriptions tend to miss.
This is the part which users are often not aware of but is very important for conversion. The small nudges that you add to the product detail page can go a long way in encouraging more people to click on that “Add to cart” button!


Customer-submitted photos displayed on the PDP itself add a layer of social proof that brand photography can’t replicate. Shoppers trust other shoppers — seeing a product worn, used, or set up in a real home removes the uncertainty that polished studio shots leave behind.


When stock is genuinely low, say so plainly. “Only 4 left” is more credible than vague urgency copy. Manufactured scarcity is easy for shoppers to spot, and it damages trust more than it helps conversion — so only use it when it’s true.


Static “you might also like” blocks are largely a legacy pattern. Today, AI-driven recommendations that pull from the user’s browsing behavior and current session context tend to perform better — because the suggestion feels relevant to that specific shopper, not like a generic afterthought served to everyone.
Accessibility on PDPs is no longer optional — it affects a wide user segment, carries legal implications in several markets, and is a factor in search performance. The basics:
Layout also plays a major role in great product detail pages. We want to highlight the different layout approaches we’ve seen in eCommerce stores out there that make UX interesting and more effective.
If the product is visual and the photos are its strong point, this is a great layout option. Users don’t lose sight of the photos while scrolling the rest of the page.


This is the opposite of the first one. If you want users to focus on the main product description and have the CTA in front of them at all times, this is the perfect layout.

This one is not common and actually quite unusual, but it works if emphasizing the photos and the CTA is your goal. In a way, it combines the first two practices—you have both the photos and main CTA at the top and all other info is below the fold.


Another layout that focuses on the photos is where the gallery is on full display. There is no need to click on thumbnails to browse through the photos. Users can smoothly scroll through everything while viewing the main description and all of the other product details.


Lastly, there are layouts that just don’t follow any rules. There is so much happening that it truly creates a unique experience. However, one must wonder how good such layouts are for conversion as a lot of the page elements can be actually distracting for the users.


When it comes to designing your product detail pages, you can follow no rules at all or create your own that others can model their practice after. There are really no strictly established rules. Nevertheless, there are certain practices that are proven to work and others that have been observed to bring about negative results. If you’re not yet familiar enough with what works and what doesn’t, we suggest you hold off breaking the rules and follow these best practices instead. But if you know the game you’re playing and willing to put in the effort to test out different approaches, being the innovative one in the industry can be good for your brand.
The stores that consistently convert well on PDPs tend to share a few things: their pages load fast, the visuals do the heavy lifting, and there’s nothing standing between the user and the buy button. Everything else is refinement on top of that.
If you want help improving your product detail pages, scandiweb’s team has delivered UX and CRO work across 2,100+ eCommerce projects — including global brands like Puma, Adidas, and Samsung. We’re the world’s #1 most certified Adobe Commerce agency, and our CRO program has delivered an average +48% conversion rate improvement across client stores.
Whether the issue is UX, technical implementation, or identifying where your PDPs are losing people, we can help. Get in touch for a free consultation and we’ll take a look at what’s actually happening on your pages.
The post Best Practices for Product Detail Pages in 2026 appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post CDP Case Study: Multi-Market Personalization for the Biggest Baltics Sportswear Retailer appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>Switching email platforms is rarely just about sending better emails. For Sportland, it was the starting point for a broader transformation in how customer data gets used across marketing.
As the leading sportswear retailer in the Baltics, Sportland required a setup that could handle multiple markets, separate store views, and siloed customer data. Rather than move to another standalone email service provider, we helped Sportland rethink the foundation.
Sportland is the leading sportswear retailer in the Baltics, known for its award-winning in-store experience and broad omnichannel presence. The business operates across multiple countries, with distinct store views and marketing teams in each market.
While they had already made strides in building a strong data foundation, marketing activation was still tied to costly tools, which were limited in terms of the email marketing automations Sportland wanted to implement.
Sportland required a solution capable of supporting multiple markets, distinct store views with different languages and product assortments, and siloed customer data. Even before the project began, this complexity presented a significant challenge, as any prospective platform needed robust configuration options to manage user consent data, customer accounts, and product catalogs effectively for campaign execution.
To fix fragmented customer data and disconnected marketing touchpoints, we implemented a customer data platform (CDP). The decision to move away from a standalone email marketing platform opened the door to a broader transformation in how Sportland manages and uses customer data in multiple markets with distinct store views and separate customer data handling.
A properly implemented CDP enables:

Project goals for Sportland’s CDP integration included:
Also read/watch our webinar:
How to Increase Your eCommerce Revenue 2-3x with CDPs
Sportland knew they had outgrown Klaviyo, but the alternative needed to support more than just email. We assisted in the selection process by comparing capabilities and costs across several CDP solutions. After a series of discovery sessions and technical deep-dives, Bloomreach was chosen for its ability to unify data across channels and support scalable marketing automation.
An often-overlooked factor in marketing platform comparisons is the management and execution perspective – how intuitive it is for teams to build templates, manage dynamic content, and launch campaigns on a day-to-day basis. For marketing teams, tool usability can be just as critical as technical capabilities.
Klaviyo was perceived as limited in terms of advanced personalization and automation capabilities. While functional, its personalization options and journey-building features did not scale well for more complex use cases.
Bloomreach, in contrast, offered a smoother content creation experience, particularly through its drag-and-drop editor, which made assembling emails faster and more efficient. More importantly, it integrated email, CDP, product recommendations, and on-site personalization into a single system, enabling a unified, 360-degree view of the customer and a stronger omnichannel strategy.
Klaviyo remains a strong option for smaller Shopify merchants, but Sportland’s growth and channel complexity called for a more advanced, unified solution.
Initially focused on site search and recommendations, Bloomreach has expanded its capabilities into marketing automation and CDP solutions. Bloomreach’s Composable Personalization Cloud combines data ingestion, AI-driven segmentation, identity resolution features, and delivery through native integrations in one place, enabling the collection and unification of customer data while delivering personalized experiences and messaging to brand customers.

Sportland operates across multiple countries, each with its own store view and customer database. A central question was whether to consolidate all markets into one project or split them by country. While a unified project promised simplicity, overlapping data and conflicting user IDs made that approach impractical. Based on our recommendation, we implemented a market-specific structure to preserve data integrity and avoid downstream issues.
We then began tailoring the Bloomreach setup to Sportland’s data ecosystem:



Because Bloomreach pricing is tied to the volume of events processed and stored, it was essential to estimate yearly traffic and optimize tracking from the start. We disabled non-essential auto-tracked events and fine-tuned the implementation to retain key data points without overspending.
To ensure user privacy, we implemented proper consent logic for event tracking. This was integrated with existing frontend controls so that marketing data collection respects user preferences in all markets.
We redefined and significantly expanded email automation flows compared to their Klaviyo setup. These flows were tailored per market, taking into account local behavior and store-specific logic:
We connected Bloomreach to Google and Meta Ads, enabling audience syncing, including predictive segments based on AI-driven purchase likelihood and RFM models.
Product recommendations were also migrated from Clerk.io to Bloomreach, requiring extensive QA and catalog mapping to ensure consistent logic across web and backend data layers. Our internal feed management tool played a key role in syncing enriched product data with Bloomreach.
To support decision-making outside marketing teams and provide more accessible performance insights, we built reporting views in Bloomreach and Looker Studio. It enables internal stakeholders to monitor and optimize campaigns without needing to navigate the CDP backend.
Within just a few months of launching the new CDP, Sportland saw improvements in email marketing and paid media. The ability to unify backend data with behavioral signals enabled more relevant, better-timed communications, while automation and audience targeting became significantly more advanced compared to the previous setup.
Email marketing
Paid media performance
– all while marketing spend was reduced by 21.3%.
Project outcomes
A CDP is a way to align your data, teams, and channels around what your customers actually need. Request a free consultation with our Analytics team, and let’s build a system that works seamlessly and delivers measurable results.
The post CDP Case Study: Multi-Market Personalization for the Biggest Baltics Sportswear Retailer appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Magento Store Redesign: Which Agency Should You Choose? appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>Magento redesign is often treated as a visual update, but in practice, it usually begins when teams struggle to implement changes as the business grows.
Conversion rates stall, so marketing asks for frontend changes and gets told it’s “complicated.” Developers keep patching around legacy decisions made five years ago. Over time, this limits the team’s ability to make changes, test improvements, and support growth.
In many Magento redesign projects, I’ve noticed that the first conversations tend to focus on the storefront interface. However, frontend performance is directly tied to architectural decisions that affect how quickly the business can implement changes.
A Magento redesign, therefore, evaluates how customer experience, SEO structure, integrations, performance, and upgrade strategy interact within the same platform. When redesign decisions ignore system architecture, new operational issues often appear after launch.
The results depend entirely on the agency you choose.
Not every store needs it.
Sometimes leadership asks for a redesign when optimization would have solved the problem. I have seen businesses initially consider a rebuild, only to discover the real bottleneck was checkout flow or specific UX friction points.
Redesign usually becomes necessary when limitations are structural rather than cosmetic. You will recognize it through patterns like these:
When several of these patterns appear together, redesign becomes the logical next step.
Enterprise Magento redesign changes multiple layers of the commerce stack.
UX, performance, integrations, SEO, analytics, accessibility, and upgrade strategy all need to align under one roadmap. Changes in one layer affect others, especially in complex Adobe Commerce setups with custom extensions and third-party integrations.
A common mistake is treating UX as only a visual upgrade. Yes, navigation improves, and product pages look better, but if structural changes are not planned, ERP sync can slow, checkout logic can break under traffic, and SEO visibility can drop.
Redesign affects every layer of the system. If you adjust the frontend without checking integrations, friction appears. If you modernize the UI but ignore release workflows, deployment slows. Without architectural planning, surface improvements can introduce new technical problems.
That’s why redesign must start with diagnosis. It requires user journey analysis, conversion research, performance auditing, integration mapping, and technical debt review. Once those foundations are clear, UI becomes strategic.
A well-executed redesign should strengthen:
When the redesign focuses primarily on interface changes, it doesn’t solve the real problem. And that misalignment only increases long-term cost and reduces ROI.
It is natural to look at design portfolios when choosing a redesign agency. Visual quality is easy to compare and shapes first impressions. But in Magento projects, success depends more on engineering and data analysis behind the interface.
When assessing a redesign partner, focus on how they approach platform architecture and conversion optimization. Agencies with Magento engineers, CRO specialists, and UX researchers are more likely to improve conversion and performance.
The first signal is how the agency approaches discovery.
If the process starts with moodboards and homepage inspiration, that’s a creative agency approach. If it starts with customer journey mapping, analytics review, performance diagnostics, and integration analysis, it shows structural discipline.
Ask them what they audit before the redesign. A comprehensive discovery phase typically includes:
The second signal is how they talk about UX.
Strong Magento UX removes friction. I would suggest paying attention to whether they mention usability testing, heuristic evaluation, and measurable A/B validation, or if they focus only on ‘modern feel’ and ‘clean aesthetics.’
The way an agency discusses UX methodology indicates whether design decisions are guided by measurement and experimentation, or primarily by visual direction.
Engineering depth determines whether a Magento redesign remains stable over time.
Frontend changes affect deployment workflows, cache behavior, indexing, extension compatibility, and upgrade paths. Decisions at the template or rendering layer influence how easily the platform can evolve in future versions.
A capable partner understands themes like Hyvä, headless architecture, deployment pipelines, and upgrade compatibility. They should also explain how interface decisions affect release speed and long-term stability.
Experience shows in how an agency manages trade-offs.
Magento redesign involves decisions that affect performance, upgrade compatibility, integrations, and long-term maintenance, so pay attention to whether a team is willing to thoughtfully push back. If a change introduces risk, the agency should explain it clearly and be comfortable saying no.
In several redesigns I’ve seen, a layout change that looked harmless in a design mockup later affected caching behavior, indexing, extension compatibility, or release processes.
The best redesign partners consider second- and third-order effects before implementation, because once a redesign goes live, consequences add up.
Magento redesign projects require a mix of design expertise, technical depth, and platform experience. The agencies listed below are known for delivering Magento store redesigns across different industries and project sizes, each with different strengths.

Best fit for: large, enterprise brands on Magento running commerce in multiple markets.
At scandiweb, Magento redesign projects bring together Magento engineers, UX researchers, and CRO specialists to analyze how the platform performs under real business conditions. Many projects begin when platform complexity slows development or limits conversion improvements.
With more than 20 years of Adobe Commerce experience, they help enterprise merchants run complex Magento stores with multiple integrations, multi-store setups, and high traffic. This hands-on experience shapes how redesigns are planned, ensuring the platform architecture supports stability and future growth.
scandiweb has completed over 2,100 Magento projects and works with more than 700 Magento clients worldwide. The team includes over 600+ commerce specialists with 900+ Adobe Commerce certifications.
Headquarters: Riga, Latvia
Client locations: Global
Focus: Magento performance optimization and business growth
Notable clients: PUMA, Läderach, Jaguar, Levi’s

Best fit for: Adobe Commerce environments with established enterprise processes.
Vaimo typically works with large Adobe Commerce environments that require coordination between multiple teams and integrated business systems. Their projects run within existing processes without interrupting day-to-day operations.
Headquarters: Stockholm, Sweden
Client locations: Global
Focus: Enterprise Adobe Commerce environments
Notable clients: Helly Hansen, Bauhaus, Xiaomi

Best fit for: companies that use analytics and customer data to guide design decisions.
Bounteous is often involved in Magento projects where personalization and analytics guide design decisions. They typically work with organizations that closely track and analyze customer behavior and use those insights to refine the storefront experience.
Headquarters: Frisco, USA
Client locations: Global
Focus: Data-driven commerce environments
Typical work: Personalization initiatives and analytics-led redesign programs
Notable clients: Coca-Cola, Caesars Entertainment, Mars

Best fit for: Magento installations with heavy customization that need careful modernization.
Atwix approaches Magento from an engineering perspective. They often work on stores that have been heavily customized and need to be updated without breaking existing functionality. Their work includes resolving extension conflicts and stabilizing complex checkout implementations.
Headquarters: Bratislava, Slovakia
Client locations: Global
Focus: Magento engineering and platform maintenance
Typical work: Upgrades, extension troubleshooting, complex checkout systems
Notable clients: Coyuchi, Cabinets.com, Wyze

Best fit for: Magento environments closely connected to ERP or CRM systems.
Brainvire is commonly selected for Magento projects that involve complex ERP and CRM integrations. In these setups, storefront updates must remain consistent with business logic handled by those systems.
Headquarters: Irving, USA
Client locations: Global
Focus: ERP and CRM integrations
Typical work: Integration-heavy commerce platforms and B2B Magento systems
Notable clients: Walt Disney, Krispy Kreme, FOX Sports

Best fit for: global companies running Magento in multiple markets.
Valtech usually participates in large digital programs that combine commerce platforms with brand and customer experience initiatives. These programs often span multiple regions and business units.
Headquarters: London, UK
Client locations: Global
Focus: Enterprise commerce programs
Typical work: Multi-market commerce platforms and global digital initiatives
Notable clients: Audi, Carrefour
Our Magento redesigns begin with understanding how the current experience performs. We start with a structured CX audit that combines expert UX review, real customer testing, performance data, and benchmarking against modern eCommerce standards. This helps identify where the actual customer journey diverges from the brand’s intended experience.
Findings are then organized into three layers:
This process produces a prioritized roadmap that guides redesign decisions. From there, our team moves into updated wireframes, UI design, and frontend development, followed by ongoing experimentation and conversion optimization once the new experience goes live.

scandiweb redesigned the Läderach Adobe Commerce storefront to better reflect the brand’s premium retail experience while improving performance and conversion.
The project began with a CRO and UX audit to identify drop-off points and usability friction across key pages. Based on these insights, we redesigned transactional flows, restructured homepage and product page layouts, and introduced clearer content hierarchy to guide users toward purchase.
Alongside the design changes, the platform was upgraded to the latest Magento 2 version and the frontend was rebuilt using Hyvä, significantly improving site performance and responsiveness.
The redesign delivered measurable improvements:

scandiweb redesigned the Airthings Magento storefront to unify the brand’s digital experience and shift the site from a product-centric catalog to a customer-focused educational platform.
The project merged multiple subdomains into a single experience and restructured navigation around use-case journeys, helping customers understand how Airthings products solve real indoor air quality problems. Key pages were redesigned to improve product discovery, integrate educational content, and guide users from learning about air quality to selecting the right device.
The frontend was rebuilt using Hyvä, and the platform integrated with HubSpot to combine Magento’s eCommerce functionality with content-driven customer journeys. This enabled a unified domain experience with faster performance and more flexible content management.
The redesign resulted in strong improvements in engagement and revenue:

scandiweb redesigned the Umniah eCommerce store to modernize the telecom provider’s digital experience and support a growing portfolio of services and devices. The project rebuilt the storefront on Magento 2 with Hyvä, introducing a faster, mobile-optimized interface aligned with modern UX standards.
The redesign began with a UX audit and benchmarking against leading telecom and eCommerce sites. Major updates included redesigned product listing and product detail pages for devices and service plans, clearer pricing structures, improved bundle configuration, and a mobile-first homepage highlighting key offers and categories. The Hyvä frontend enabled faster performance and flexible content blocks while supporting integrations with systems such as Oracle ERP, Hyperpay, Insider personalization, and other internal services.
Outcomes of the redesign included:
Magento redesign projects rarely fail because of visual design, but when architecture, integrations, and performance are not considered early enough in the process.
The agencies listed above each bring different strengths – some specialize in UX and design systems, others in enterprise Adobe Commerce builds or platform modernization. The key is choosing a partner that understands how the platform needs to function long after the redesign is launched, including integrations, performance under load, and the flexibility to support future growth.
If you’re evaluating a Magento storefront redesign, the first step is understanding where the current experience creates friction for users and limitations for the business. scandiweb helps enterprise brands redesign and modernize Adobe Commerce storefronts and implement a new UX strategy. Talk to our team to explore your Magento redesign options.
The post Magento Store Redesign: Which Agency Should You Choose? appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Why EU Digital Sovereignty Is the Next Big Shift in AI Infrastructure appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>For the past decade, most companies building AI systems have relied on the same infrastructure stack: American cloud providers, globally distributed data centers, and proprietary foundation models hosted outside Europe. That architecture is increasingly colliding with a new reality.
Across the European Union, regulation, geopolitics, and procurement requirements are converging around a single idea. Digital sovereignty. The ability to control where data is processed, who operates the infrastructure, and which jurisdictions govern the technology stack is becoming a strategic concern for governments and enterprises alike.
In modern businesses, where AI increasingly processes customer data, internal analytics, operational workflows, and decision-making tools, this shift has direct implications. The critical question is where AI runs and who ultimately controls the infrastructure behind it.
Digital sovereignty has become a central goal of EU technology policy. The concept refers to Europe’s ability to develop and operate digital infrastructure, such as cloud platforms and AI systems, without relying entirely on external providers.
Initiatives include:
For example, the EU’s broader AI strategy includes significant investment programs designed to expand compute infrastructure and support domestic AI innovation. At the same time, European organizations are placing greater emphasis on control over data and infrastructure, accelerating demand for sovereign AI solutions.
This movement reflects practical concerns about:
Europe’s regulatory environment is often discussed in isolation – GDPR here, the AI Act there, but the real shift emerges when these frameworks are considered together. Several key regulations impact how AI systems can operate in Europe.

The General Data Protection Regulation governs the collection, processing, and transfer of personal data. Its extraterritorial scope means companies operating in the EU must ensure lawful processing and adequate protection even when data moves across borders.
For AI systems trained on customer behavior, product interactions, or marketing analytics, this has direct implications for where training and inference workloads can occur.
The AI Act introduces a risk-based framework for AI systems. AI applications are categorized by risk level, ranging from minimal to unacceptable, with higher-risk systems subject to strict requirements around transparency, monitoring, and governance. Companies deploying AI within the EU must ensure that models and systems comply with these obligations regardless of where the technology originates.
Also read:
EU AI Act for eCommerce: 10 Questions Every Business Is Asking Right Now
Additional regulations, including the Data Act and the Data Governance Act, address how data can be accessed, shared, and transferred across jurisdictions.
Together, these policies reflect a broader strategy of ensuring that European data and algorithms operate under European legal control.
If you are responsible for technology in an eCommerce business, AI has likely already become part of your platform architecture.
You may be using AI for:
All of these systems process large volumes of customer and behavioral data, often continuously.
If your AI stack relies on external providers, you may need to consider several risks:
These concerns are becoming particularly relevant if your company sells to regulated industries or works with government organizations. In those environments, AI infrastructure decisions are increasingly evaluated through the lens of data residency, security, and regulatory compliance. More companies are beginning to assess where those AI systems run and who controls the underlying infrastructure.
If you are selling to enterprise clients, regulated industries, or the public sector, AI infrastructure is starting to appear in procurement reviews. In addition to performance and features, buyers increasingly ask vendors to demonstrate:
This means AI architecture decisions can affect whether your company is eligible for certain contracts in the first place. Organizations that cannot clearly demonstrate where their AI runs, how customer data is handled, and which jurisdiction governs the infrastructure may face additional scrutiny during vendor evaluation or be excluded from procurement processes altogether. As a result, more companies are beginning to explore sovereign AI architectures that keep data, models, and infrastructure within European control.
Organizations approaching AI sovereignty typically adopt one of three architectural models (they differ primarily in how data moves and where processing occurs).

In edge deployments, AI models run directly on devices or local systems. Examples include:
The data never leaves the local environment, there are minimal external dependencies, and strong privacy guarantees. However, edge deployments often require smaller models and limited compute resources.
A second approach involves hosting AI workloads in European data centers operated within EU jurisdiction, balancing scalability and regulatory compliance while preserving access to larger models and compute capacity. In this model:
The most secure architecture involves air-gapped AI systems commonly used in government systems, defense and critical infrastructure, and financial services and regulated industries. While more complex to implement, this architecture provides the highest level of control over data residency and system integrity:

Building sovereign AI systems requires a combination of infrastructure design, compliance expertise, and model engineering.
Typical implementation components include:
As AI becomes a core layer of digital commerce infrastructure, you need a partner who understands AI architecture and regulatory constraints, allowing you to adopt AI capabilities while maintaining full control over customer data, infrastructure, and compliance obligations.
scandiweb works with organizations to design and deploy sovereign AI environments tailored to their requirements, including:
Europe is defining an AI model built around transparency and governance. AI infrastructure decisions are becoming strategic, encompassing sovereignty, compliance, and long-term market access.
Organizations that adapt their architecture early will be better positioned to work with enterprise clients and regulated industries as the sovereign AI processes continue to grow.
If you are evaluating how to deploy AI, scandiweb can help design and implement sovereign AI solutions tailored to your business architecture. Contact our AI consultants to learn more about sovereign AI and EU-hosted LLM solutions.
The post Why EU Digital Sovereignty Is the Next Big Shift in AI Infrastructure appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post Top 9 Best Magento Payment Gateways for Your Online Store in 2026 appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>A smooth checkout can make or break a sale, yet many Magento store owners overlook how crucial the right payment gateway is. The right Magento 2 payment gateway provider ensures seamless integration with your platform, reliable service, and a hassle-free checkout. Without it, you risk limited payment options, errors, and security issues—problems that hurt trust and cost sales.
Magento 2 (Adobe Commerce) offers payment gateways for businesses of all sizes. The right choice can streamline operations, build customer confidence, and boost revenue. This guide breaks down the top options, their features, and how to find the best fit for your store.

A payment gateway in eCommerce is the bridge between your Magento store and payment processors, enabling secure and smooth online transactions. It handles credit cards, digital wallets, and other payment methods, ensuring your customers have a hassle-free checkout experience. Some payment gateways can function as a payment processor, validating transactions and ensuring secure money transfers to merchant accounts.
Magento supports a variety of payment gateways tailored to different business needs, offering features like multi-currency support, real-time processing, and PCI compliance. Modern Magento stores increasingly rely on gateways that support digital wallets, local payment methods, and Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) required by PSD2 regulations. Most gateways today also support Apple Pay, Google Pay, and region-specific payment methods that improve checkout conversion.
Tools like Magento payment plugins and gateway extensions make it simple to expand your payment options and streamline tasks like credit card processing. The right Magento payment gateway integration helps you build trust, reduce cart abandonment, and keep your operations running smoothly.

We get it—cost is often the first thing you think about when choosing a payment gateway for your Magento store. After all, every fee adds up, and it’s crucial to find a solution that fits your budget without compromising on quality.
Start by checking the transaction fees to ensure they align with the features you’re getting. Consider the costs for different types of transactions, such as credit card payments and recurring payments. Keep in mind that some payment gateways charge monthly fees in addition to transaction fees. Make sure the gateway supports various payment methods, including credit and debit cards, and local payment methods, to cater to different customer preferences. If you offer subscriptions, pick a gateway with recurring billing to keep things simple.
To summarize, look for:

Checkout.com is a global payment platform that makes online commerce simple and efficient. Checkout.com is known for its flexibility and ease of use, besides these features:
Pros of Checkout.com:
Cons of Checkout.com:

Stripe is a leading payment platform known for its versatility and developer-friendly tools, making it a great fit for Magento merchants. Key features of Stripe are:
Pros of Stripe:
Cons of Stripe:

Adyen is a global payment platform known for its seamless omnichannel payment capabilities, making it ideal for Magento merchants handling online, mobile, and in-store transactions. Besides that, key features include:
Pros of Adyen:
Cons of Adyen:

PayPal is a globally recognized payment gateway, making it a trusted choice for businesses of all sizes. Key features of PayPal are:
Pros of PayPal:
Cons of PayPal:

2Checkout (now Verifone) is a global payment gateway known for its all-in-one platform, combining payment processing with tools like subscription management and tax compliance. Besides, 2Checkout is known for:
Pros of 2Checkout:
Cons of 2Checkout:

Klarna is a Swedish fintech known for its Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) service, letting customers split purchases into interest-free installments while boosting sales for merchants. Klarna is also known for:
Pros of Klarna:
Cons of Klarna:

Mondu is a unique payment gateway focusing exclusively on B2B payments, specializing in BNPL solutions for B2B transactions that offer flexible payment terms to improve cash flow and reduce default risks. Besides this standout feature, Mondu is also known for:
Pros of Mondu:
Cons of Mondu:

Planet is a financial services provider known for combining payment solutions with VAT refund services and integrated technologies, tailored for industries like retail and hospitality.
Key features:
Pros of Planet:
Cons of Planet:

Bolt is a checkout platform known for its “One-Click Checkout,” simplifying payments and reducing cart abandonment for Magento merchants.
Key features:
Pros of Bolt:
Cons of Bolt:
| Payment gateway | Best for | Payment methods supported | Key strength |
| Checkout.com | Global eCommerce brands | Cards, wallets, local methods | Flexible API and strong international acquiring |
| Stripe | Developer-focused stores and fast scaling | Cards, wallets, BNPL, local methods | Extensive APIs and fast feature rollout |
| Adyen | Enterprise and omnichannel retail | Cards, wallets, local methods | Unified commerce platform for online and in-store payments |
| PayPal | Stores needing fast setup and brand trust | PayPal, cards, wallets | High consumer trust and quick deployment |
| 2Checkout | Subscriptions and SaaS-style billing | Cards, PayPal, local methods | Built-in subscription and tax management |
| Klarna | Retailers using BNPL to boost AOV | BNPL, cards | Strong Buy Now, Pay Later adoption |
| Mondu | B2B commerce platforms | Invoice, BNPL, bank transfer | B2B credit and invoice payment automation |
| Planet | Retail and travel commerce | Cards, multi-currency payments | Payment processing combined with VAT services |
| Bolt | Checkout conversion optimization | Cards, wallets | One-click checkout and fraud guarantee |

Installing a payment gateway in Magento 2 is not a complicated process. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you through it.
Integrating a payment gateway is straightforward, but if you want to ensure everything is set up correctly and tailored to your Magento store, a professional Magento developer can handle it seamlessly for you. Partnering with an expert guarantees a smooth integration process and optimized functionality.

Your payment gateway isn’t just a back-end tool—it’s the final step in your customers’ shopping journey. A poor choice can lead to abandoned carts, lost sales, and frustrated customers.
Every hiccup at checkout risks breaking customer trust. In today’s competitive market, a smooth and secure checkout isn’t optional—it’s essential. Businesses that prioritize the right payment gateway see fewer abandoned carts, happier customers, and sustainable growth.
Your customers deserve a seamless checkout. Choose a payment gateway that aligns with your goals and ensures your Magento store thrives!

The right payment gateway for Magento depends on your business needs. Some of the most popular options include PayPal, Stripe, 2Checkout, Klarna, and Adyen. Each of these gateways offers robust security, multi-currency support, and seamless Magento 2 integration, but their specific features and transaction fees will determine whether it is the best fit for you.
A Magento payment gateway is a secure way for online transactions to communicate between your eCommerce store and payment processors. It allows you to accept credit cards, digital wallets, and other payment methods while meeting the highest security standards.
Access the Magento 2 Admin Panel and navigate to Stores > Configuration > Sales > Payment Methods. Here, you can enable or disable payment methods, configure their settings, and save your changes to update your store. Then, select your desired gateway, configure its settings, and enable it for your store.
The cost of a Magento payment gateway varies by provider. Most gateways charge a transaction fee, which typically falls between 2.6% and 4% of the total sale amount. Some gateways also charge a flat fee per transaction, such as $0.30. Additionally, some providers may charge monthly fees or setup costs. However, actual fees depend on region, payment method, and negotiated merchant rates. Be sure to explore each gateway’s pricing structure to get an accurate picture of the total costs involved.
Magento 2 payment restrictions allow you to control which payment methods are available to customers based on a range of conditions. These conditions might include shipping methods, customer groups, product attributes, order totals, or geographic locations. By applying payment restrictions, you can tailor the payment options available at checkout to fit your business policies and customer expectations.
Yes. Most modern Magento payment gateways support digital wallets such as Apple Pay and Google Pay. These payment methods reduce checkout friction and improve mobile conversion rates, especially when combined with express checkout functionality.
Ready to upgrade your Magento store’s checkout experience? Reach out to us, and we’ll help you choose the best payment gateway and install it in your Magento store!
scandiweb is a leading eCommerce agency, specializing in Magento development, payment gateway integrations, and end-to-end digital services. With a proven track record of delivering tailored solutions for global brands, scandiweb combines technical expertise with a client-first approach to help more than 600 businesses thrive online.
The post Top 9 Best Magento Payment Gateways for Your Online Store in 2026 appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>The post EU AI Act for eCommerce: 10 Questions Every Business Is Asking Right Now appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>If your eCommerce store uses AI – product recommendations, chatbots, pricing tools, fraud detection – the EU AI Act likely applies to some part of your technology stack.
The regulation entered into force in 2024, with rules rolling out between 2025 and 2027. Companies using AI in the EU will need to understand how their systems are classified and what obligations come with them.
You’re probably asking: “How does the EU AI Act actually affect my store?”
We’re here to answer the key questions about this regulatory act and explain what it means for your business.

To begin with, it helps to understand how the EU AI Act classifies AI systems. The regulation uses a risk-based model, meaning not all AI is regulated in the same way. Instead, AI systems are grouped into four categories:
Most retail AI tools – recommendation engines, AI search, demand forecasting, and merchandising algorithms – fall into the limited-risk or minimal-risk categories. That means businesses can continue using them, though certain transparency or documentation requirements may apply.
Still, there are grey areas. Dynamic pricing, customer profiling, and AI chatbots are all common features in modern online stores, and each of them interacts with the regulation in slightly different ways.
Below are ten questions eCommerce teams ask most often when trying to understand how the EU AI Act affects their business.

The EU AI Act applies to companies that use AI systems affecting customers in the EU. That includes eCommerce stores running AI-powered tools.
For a Shopify or Magento (Adobe Commerce) store, the Act becomes relevant when the store uses AI features such as:
In these cases, your business is responsible for how the AI system is used, even if the technology comes from a SaaS vendor.
The good news is that many of these AI eCommerce tools fall into low regulatory categories. In practice, this usually means basic transparency or documentation, not heavy compliance procedures. To understand what compliance may be required, ask these quick questions about each AI tool used in your store:
If the answer to any of these is no, it will usually fall into a low-risk category and require little additional compliance.
Quick takeaway
The platform itself isn’t the problem. Simply review what AI tools are used and document how they work – the most common uses usually fall into low-risk categories with minimal compliance requirements.
In most cases, no. Recommendation engines used in eCommerce are typically not considered high-risk AI under the EU AI Act.
High-risk systems mainly involve areas where automated decisions can significantly affect people’s rights or opportunities. For example, hiring decisions, credit scoring, biometrical identification etc.
Typical retail personalization tools do not fall into these categories.
However, there are a few situations worth reviewing. Regulators may look more closely if an algorithm:
Even then, these issues usually fall under consumer protection rules or GDPR profiling requirements, not the high-risk AI category itself.
Quick takeaway
Recommendation engines usually are not high-risk AI. Still, documenting how these tools work and what data they use is a good practice.
Yes. The EU AI Act does not prohibit dynamic pricing.
Under the EU AI Act, most dynamic pricing systems fall into the minimal-risk AI category. That means retailers can continue using algorithms that adjust prices based on demand, inventory, or customer behavior.
Regulators focus on how the pricing algorithm affects customers, not the fact that prices change.
Problems may arise if an algorithm:
These situations can trigger scrutiny under consumer protection law or GDPR.
Quick takeaway
Dynamic pricing itself isn’t restricted by the EU AI Act. Just make sure your pricing algorithm relies on legitimate signals like demand or inventory, not sensitive personal data or manipulative targeting.
In simple terms, profiling means using personal data to predict or evaluate a customer’s behavior.
In eCommerce this happens all the time. Stores analyze browsing history, past purchases, and engagement signals to personalize recommendations or marketing messages.
This type of profiling is not automatically prohibited under the EU AI Act.
Regulators become concerned when AI systems manipulate users or exploit vulnerabilities. Examples include systems that:
The key difference lies in intent and impact. Personalization that helps customers discover relevant products is generally acceptable. Systems designed to manipulate behavior or discriminate against certain groups can trigger regulatory scrutiny.
Quick takeaway
Make sure you understand exactly how your AI profiles customers, keep the logic transparent, and avoid automated decisions that could unfairly disadvantage certain users.

Yes. The EU AI Act requires disclosure when customers interact with an AI chatbot.
If users could reasonably assume they are speaking with a human, the system must clearly indicate that the interaction is automated.
Compared with other parts of the EU AI Act, this obligation is relatively light. A compliant implementation for AI chatbots and virtual assistants is usually simple:
This rule applies regardless of whether the chatbot is built internally or provided by a third-party vendor. If your store deploys the chatbot, your business is responsible for the disclosure.
Quick takeaway
In most cases you just need to tell users they’re interacting with AI – for example: “Hi, I’m a virtual assistant. I can help you find products or check order status.” A simple message like this is usually enough to meet the EU AI Act transparency requirement.
The EU AI Act penalties are similar in scale to GDPR and depend on the type of violation.
The maximum fines are:
Regulators apply the higher of the fixed fine or the revenue percentage.
The good news is that most eCommerce AI tools typically fall into minimal-risk or limited-risk AI. In these cases, compliance mainly involves transparency and responsible data use. However, the bigger risk is not the fine itself. It is not knowing which AI systems are running in the business and how they fit into the EU AI Act risk categories.
Quick takeaway
To reduce the risk of fines, start by mapping all AI tools used in your business and identifying their risk category under the EU AI Act.
Using AI tools from US vendors like OpenAI is still allowed. What matters is whether the AI system is used in the European market.
That means that you are responsible for how the AI tool is used in your store, even if the technology comes from a third-party vendor.
When using external AI tools, it is worth checking:
Many major vendors are already preparing documentation for EU AI Act compliance. Retailers should still confirm how their providers handle data sources, model behavior, and transparency requirements.
Quick takeaway
Using US AI tools is allowed, but you’re still responsible for how they’re used in your store. Ask vendors how they handle EU AI Act compliance, data sources, and transparency requirements.
In simple terms, chain of custody means knowing where the data used by an AI system comes from and how it moves through the system.
This usually involves tracking:
Under the EU AI Act, these traceability requirements mainly apply to high-risk AI systems. For most eCommerce use cases, the requirement is relatively light. Retail AI tools typically rely on store data that businesses already control.
The practical step is to keep basic documentation of:
Many companies already maintain similar documentation through GDPR compliance and vendor reviews.
Quick takeaway
Chain of custody means tracking where your AI data comes from and how it’s used – something many businesses already do through GDPR processes.
Usually no. Internal AI systems typically fall into the minimal-risk category under the EU AI Act.
These are use cases such as:
Because these tools support internal decision-making and do not directly influence customers, they are generally considered minimal-risk AI. These are largely unregulated under the EU AI Act. Businesses can continue using them without certification or strict transparency requirements.
That said, companies should still keep a basic record of where AI is used internally. Internal systems sometimes evolve into customer-facing features, such as automated pricing or product recommendations, which can change the regulatory requirements.
Quick takeaway
n most cases, internal AI is the lowest compliance priority. Focus instead on AI tools that interact with customers or make automated decisions about them.
Start by mapping the AI systems used in your eCommerce stack. Typical places to check include:
Once these systems are identified, classify them according to the EU AI Act risk categories: prohibited, high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk.
Most retail AI tools fall into limited-risk or minimal-risk, which usually require transparency or documentation rather than strict regulation.
After classification, review three areas:
Quick takeaway
EU AI Act compliance usually starts with mapping the AI tools in your stack and documenting how they work. If you’re unsure how your systems fit into the regulation, consulting with a compliance or AI specialist can help clarify the next steps.
The EU AI Act does not aim to stop companies from using AI in eCommerce. They want companies to understand where AI influences people and to be transparent about it.
For most retailers, the real work is not removing AI tools or slowing innovation. It is knowing which systems you run, what data they rely on, and where automated decisions affect customers. Once that visibility exists, compliance becomes part of normal governance – much like GDPR did a few years ago.
If you want a quick review of how the EU AI Act applies to your eCommerce AI tools, talk to our AI consultants. Contact us, and our team can map your AI systems and flag the areas that may require attention.
The post EU AI Act for eCommerce: 10 Questions Every Business Is Asking Right Now appeared first on scandiweb.
]]>