scandiweb identifies every compliance gap in your AI systems and fixes them at the code level.
One partner, from audit to implementation.
Start with a free 45-minute call. We'll map your AI systems, assess your regulatory exposure, and tell you exactly what compliance requires.
A 45-minute call to map your AI systems, assess your risk, and outline what compliance looks like for you.
We find every AI system in your organization and classify it by risk level. No guesswork.
We compare where you are to where you need to be and give you a prioritized action plan.
Our engineers build the required controls directly in your codebase. Documentation included.
We prepare your assessment, handle CE marking, and complete regulatory registration.
Quarterly reviews, documentation updates, annual reassessment. You stay compliant as things change.





Yes, if your AI systems affect EU users. The Act follows your users, not your headquarters. A US SaaS platform used by French companies, a Canadian HR tool screening EU applicants, an Israeli fintech scoring EU borrowers. All are in scope.
It uses a four-tier risk classification. Prohibited systems are banned outright. High-risk systems face the heaviest obligations: AI used in hiring, credit decisions, education, critical infrastructure, and biometrics. Limited-risk systems like chatbots have transparency obligations. Minimal-risk systems have no mandatory requirements.
Providers build AI systems and carry the heaviest burden: technical documentation, conformity assessment, CE marking, registration, and incident reporting. Deployers use AI systems in their operations and must ensure human oversight, retain logs for 6 months, and monitor operations. Deployers who substantially modify a system become providers.
Yes. As a deployer you have obligations regardless of who built the system. If you substantially modify it or change its intended purpose, you become a provider with full provider obligations.
That is what our audit answers. 40% of enterprise AI systems cannot be reliably self-classified. We use the Act's risk classification framework to give you a defensible, documented classification for every system.
3 to 6 months with existing infrastructure in place, 6 to 12 months from scratch. We compress timelines through parallel workstreams wherever possible.
Enforcement begins. Fines up to €15 million or 3% of global annual turnover for high-risk violations. Systems can be ordered off the EU market. For prohibited practices already in force since February 2025, fines reach €35 million or 7% of global turnover.
Most high-risk AI systems can self-assess. Biometric systems and AI embedded in regulated products like medical devices require third-party assessment. We determine the right route during the gap analysis.
Law firms interpret the regulation but cannot implement technical changes. Compliance consultancies produce reports but rarely write code. scandiweb does both. The gap analysis and the technical implementation come from the same team, with no handoff in between.
A free 45-minute call with one of our AI compliance specialists. You walk away with a clear picture of where you stand, what is at risk, and what getting compliant requires for your specific situation.