4.9
Consent architecture and tracking audits for the data your store collects, configured by the same analytics team that builds the tracking itself.
Most exposure starts in the implementation – even though the cookie banner is in place, and the policy is written, tags keep firing before anyone agreed and nobody has checked what the third parties receive.
A banner that appears while analytics and marketing tags have already loaded gives the appearance of compliance without the substance.
Third-party tags accumulate over years of campaigns, and few teams can produce a current list of who receives their customer data.
When legal asks what is collected and on what basis, the answer has to be rebuilt by hand from the tag manager and the CMP every time.
The starting point is an inventory of what your site collects today and which vendors receive it. Implementation of the tag and consent changes is delivered by our tracking setup team.
Your setup may already handle part of this list
We record every tag, pixel, and API call the site makes, with the data each sends and the third party on the other end.
Each item is checked against the consent state it should respect, and anything firing early is listed with the exposure it creates.
We specify how signals should pass from your CMP into every platform, market by market, since defaults differ across regions.
Changes are applied and then verified by refusing consent, confirming that no downstream platform receives anything.
The inventory and the consent design are written up for your legal team, and your own staff are trained to keep both current.
.png)
No. We handle the data stack — what is collected, on what consent basis, and which vendors receive it. Policies, terms, and regulatory interpretation come from our legal consultancy team, and the two often work on the same project.
Some, and less than most teams expect. Our published work brought missing orders down from over 15% to roughly 5% while every tag stayed gated behind consent. The loss comes from a poor implementation more often than from the consent requirement.
Yes, and that is the common case. The inventory stage records what is firing regardless of who configured it, and the findings are handed over even if the remediation goes elsewhere.
Platforms including OneTrust, CookieBot, and Amasty, alongside the consent frameworks built into Google and Adobe. The recommendation follows what your markets require and what your team can maintain, and we work with a CMP you already license.
A written inventory of every tag and the data it sends, a consent design per market, the configuration applied and tested, and documentation your legal team can work from. The inventory alone is usually the piece clients did not have.
Tell us which markets you sell into and what consent platform you use today. A specialist will come back with the scope of a collection inventory.
Prefer to talk now? Book a call straight away, or email us at: [email protected]
A specialist will look at what your site collects today and where each item is sent.